Toyota Corolla Cross vs. Mazda CX-30

Toyota Corolla Cross vs. Mazda CX-30: Compact SUV Clash

In the competitive world of compact SUVs, two nameplates stand out for their balance of practicality, affordability, and driving experience: the Toyota Corolla Cross and the Mazda CX-30. These vehicles target similar buyers—young professionals, small families, and commuters—looking for style, reliability, and versatility in a small SUV package. But while they share some goals, their execution differs significantly. In this in-depth comparison, we’ll explore how these compact crossovers stack up against each other across performance, design, interior comfort, technology, safety, and value.


Performance: Reliability vs. Driving Excitement

Toyota Corolla Cross

  • Engine: 2.0-liter 4-cylinder
  • Horsepower: 169 hp
  • Transmission: CVT (Continuously Variable Transmission)
  • Drivetrain: FWD or AWD
  • Fuel Economy: Up to 32 mpg combined

The Toyota Corolla Cross offers a predictable and smooth ride. It’s not designed for sporty performance but rather for ease of use and dependable commuting. The CVT transmission prioritizes fuel efficiency and relaxed acceleration.

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Options: 2.5-liter 4-cylinder (standard) / 2.5-liter turbocharged 4-cylinder (optional)
  • Horsepower: 191 hp (standard), up to 250 hp (turbo w/ premium fuel)
  • Transmission: 6-speed automatic
  • Drivetrain: Standard AWD
  • Fuel Economy: Up to 29 mpg combined

Mazda continues to live up to its reputation for building fun-to-drive vehicles. The CX-30 is surprisingly agile, especially with the turbocharged engine. The handling feels more responsive than most competitors in this segment, appealing to those who value driving dynamics.

Winner: Mazda CX-30, for its engaging drive and powerful engine options.


Design: Conservative vs. Expressive

The Corolla Cross takes a pragmatic approach with clean, straightforward lines. It looks like a scaled-up Corolla sedan with SUV proportions—subtle but inoffensive. Mazda, on the other hand, leans into its “Kodo” design language, with the CX-30 offering flowing curves, a sculpted grille, and a more premium appearance.

Dimensions Comparison:

SpecificationToyota Corolla CrossMazda CX-30
Overall Length175.6 in173.0 in
Width71.9 in70.7 in
Height64.8 in61.7 in
Wheelbase103.9 in104.4 in
Ground Clearance8.1 in8.0 in

The Corolla Cross stands taller, offering a more upright SUV feel, while the CX-30 looks lower and sportier. Ground clearance is nearly identical, but the Toyota feels a bit more rugged in presence.

Winner: Mazda CX-30, for its striking design and upscale vibe.


Interior Comfort and Space: Practicality vs. Premium Feel

Toyota Corolla Cross

  • More upright seating position
  • Spacious rear seats for the class
  • 60/40 split-folding rear seats
  • Up to 66.8 cubic feet of cargo space (with seats folded)

Mazda CX-30

  • Upscale cabin with premium materials
  • Tighter rear-seat space
  • Up to 45.2 cubic feet of cargo space (with seats folded)

While the CX-30’s interior materials and finishes are a cut above, the Corolla Cross wins in spaciousness. If cargo and passenger room are a priority—especially for families or road-trippers—the Toyota is the better bet.

Winner: Toyota Corolla Cross, for practicality and room.


Technology: Simplicity vs. Innovation

Toyota Corolla Cross

  • 8-inch touchscreen
  • Wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto
  • Optional JBL premium audio
  • Toyota Audio Multimedia system

Mazda CX-30

  • 8.8-inch center display (non-touchscreen, controlled by rotary dial)
  • Wired Apple CarPlay and Android Auto
  • Optional Bose 12-speaker sound system
  • More modern digital interface but steeper learning curve

While Mazda’s tech setup looks more premium, some users may find Toyota’s more straightforward touchscreen interface easier to use.

Winner: Tie, depending on user preference—Mazda for sleekness, Toyota for ease.


Safety: Toyota’s Standard Excellence vs. Mazda’s Upgrades

Toyota Corolla Cross

  • Toyota Safety Sense 3.0
  • Standard adaptive cruise control
  • Lane departure alert with steering assist
  • Pre-collision system with pedestrian detection

Mazda CX-30

  • i-Activsense safety features
  • Adaptive cruise control
  • Lane-keep assist
  • Optional 360° view monitor

Both vehicles offer excellent safety suites, but Toyota includes more as standard across the lineup, while Mazda requires stepping up in trim.

Winner: Toyota Corolla Cross, for its generous standard safety tech.


Pricing and Value: Affordability vs. Features

Trim LevelToyota Corolla Cross (MSRP)Mazda CX-30 (MSRP)
Base Trim$24,500$25,000
Mid Trim$26,800$27,700
Top Trim$31,000$32,500 (Turbo Premium)

Toyota generally offers a lower starting price and more value per dollar at the entry-level. However, Mazda counters with more premium features in higher trims.

Winner: Toyota Corolla Cross, especially for budget-conscious shoppers.


Reliability and Ownership Experience

Toyota has long held a strong reputation for reliability, and the Corolla Cross is no exception. It’s backed by a solid warranty and widespread dealership support. Mazda has improved in this area, but Toyota still leads in resale value and long-term dependability.

Winner: Toyota Corolla Cross, for proven reliability.


Final Verdict: Which One Is Right for You?

CategoryWinner
PerformanceMazda CX-30
Exterior DesignMazda CX-30
Interior SpaceToyota Corolla Cross
TechnologyTie
SafetyToyota Corolla Cross
ValueToyota Corolla Cross
ReliabilityToyota Corolla Cross

Buy the Toyota Corolla Cross if you want:

  • Excellent reliability
  • Strong safety features
  • More interior space and cargo capacity
  • Budget-friendly pricing

Buy the Mazda CX-30 if you want:

  • A more thrilling driving experience
  • Premium interior and design
  • Optional turbocharged power
  • Sportier aesthetics

In the compact SUV clash between Toyota and Mazda, the Corolla Cross emerges as the more rational choice—an ideal vehicle for practical-minded buyers. But for those willing to pay a little more for luxury feel and dynamic driving, the CX-30 has undeniable charm.

Either way, you’re looking at two of the best compact SUVs on the market.